Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Cannon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 29, 1977No. SC 1784PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMON, Justice.

This case involves a dispute within the Cannon family over certain real property. The issue is whether the testimony of cer*289tain witnesses is admissible under the Dead Man’s Statute, Tit. 7, § 433, Code of Alabama 1940, Recompiled 1958.1

The property was originally owned by P. M. Cannon who died intestate in 1928.2 He left a widow, Mary Elizabeth Cannon, and six children. Joe C. Cannon, one of the six children, died in 1943 leaving a widow and four children. Between 1957 and 1960 all parties holding any interest in the real estate — i. e., the five living children of P. M.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hanks v. HanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  2. Niehuss v. FordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. Taylor v. First National Bank of TuskaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  4. Ambrose v. VandefordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  5. COLEMAN v. KierbowMississippi Supreme Court · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lappan v. LovetteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Cale v. NapierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Kemp v. KroutterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API