State v. Gambling Paraphernalia, Devices, Equipment & Proceeds
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice PERKES.
This is a civil-forfeiture case. By a single issue, the State argues the trial court erred as a matter of law by concluding the seized devices are not gambling devices because the “replay” that the devices awards is not a “thing of value” under the Penal Code. The trial court denied the State’s motion for forfeiture. We sustain the State’s issue on appeal, and reverse and render a judgment of forfeiture.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The State of Texas moved for forfeiture of gambling paraphernalia, devices, and equipment and proceeds. The property was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- City of San Antonio v. City of BoerneTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Texas Lottery Commission v. First State Bank of DeQueenTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Hardy v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Singleton v. Casteel, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- $1760.00 in United States Currency, 37 "8" Liner MacHines v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
- $1760.00 in United States Currency, 37 "8" Liner MacHines v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
- $49,815.00 U. S. Currency and Assorted Property (Farid Ali Datoo) v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2023