Legal Opinion
Singleton v. Casteel
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided September 25, 2008No. 14-07-00932-CVPublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE B. YATES, Justice.
In this interlocutory appeal, appellants the City of League City, Texas (“the City”) and League City police officers Raymond Singleton and Walter Hammann (collectively “the officers”) appeal the trial court’s order denying their motion to dismiss. In their sole issue on appeal, appellants contend the trial court erred in denying their motion to dismiss the claims filed by appellee, Kenneth Casteel, against the officers because the claims are barred by section 101.106 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. We reverse the trial court’s order and render…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- American Transitional Care Centers of Texas, Inc. v. PalaciosTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Texas a & M University System v. KoseogluTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- City of San Antonio v. City of BoerneTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Mission Consolidated Independent School District v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- William Carl Wooley v. Randy Schaffer, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Hintz Ex Rel. Hintz v. Lally, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
- Fink v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Texas Department of Transportation v. Malcolm G. Dyer, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
- Larsen v. Santa Fe Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.