Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Allen
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam,
A majority, Mr. Justice Drew dissenting, agrees that, as applied to this case, the challenged statute may be held not to conflict with the contract clause of the state constitution, reaching that conclusion on the ground that it is desirable to preserve uniformity of construction of the contract clauses of both state and federal constitutions: compare Gelfert v. National City Bank, 313 U. S. 221.
As the record does not involve the application of the Act to sales on judgments in personam made prior to its effective date, no opinion on that subject is expressed. See, however, McCabe…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCullough v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Hodges v. SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Gelfert v. National City Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Ladner v. Siegel (No. 4)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Memphis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co., Etc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Coane v. Girard Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- McGrath EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Associates Discount Corp. v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Cooper v. Lucas Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.