Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Ellis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 19, 1992Published

1DissentKassal, J.

I join in the dissent, and would add that the record supports defendant’s claim that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. That counsel failed to provide the constitutionally mandated level of "meaningful representation” (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147) is evident at virtually every stage of this trial.

For example, counsel made an opening statement in which he raised the defense of justification for defendant’s use of force and, in so doing, created an expectation that defendant would testify, by assuring the jury that the prosecutor "knows less than I know because I have heard…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. DekleNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. DekleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. People v. JohnstoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. People v. NixonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API