Legal Opinion
United States v. Spadafora
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 22, 1953No. 10882_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
In this proceeding appellant was not represented by counsel and was unable to be present at the time set for the oral argument before this court. Government counsel very properly agreed that the case be submitted to us on the briefs filed herein.
On December 12, 1949, after a trial before a jury, appellant was convicted of possession of forged and counterfeit $20 and $10 Federal Reserve Notes and of conspiracy to pass, utter and to keep and possess said notes. He appealed to this court from the judgment of conviction, among other contentions charging error in the district court's ruling on his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Wallace v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- United States v. SpadaforaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- United States v. JonikasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Thompson Products, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. MorinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- United States v. Joseph JakalskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- Commercial Security Bank v. Walker Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Ernest Jefferson WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- Calvin Fennell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.