Legal Opinion
Hayes v. Pierson
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 20, 1899PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Oil cross-bills.
1Per curiam
The decree appealed from is affirmed upon the grounds stated by Vice-Chancellor Stevens, who delivered the following opinion:
This is a bill filed by the receiver of the Celluloid Emery Wheel Company against Daniel Pierson, Jr., and Albert C. Courter, two of its directors, and against the Electric Emery Wheel Company, a corporation of which Pierson and Courter are directors and stockholders.
The receiver charges that the defendants, Pierson and Courter, violated the trust reposed in them as directors of the celluloid company in two particulars.
*354In the first place, it is said that they concurred…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Whitfield v. KernSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- Graselli Chemical Co. v. Ætna Explosives Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Raynolds v. Diamond Mills Paper Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
- Roxbury State Bank v. the ClarendonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Green v. FeltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.