Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Kebke

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1943PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

The question for our consideration and determination involves the construction of the will of Herman Rhodes, deceased. The said Herman Rhodes was a successful business man in Memphis, and about five years before his death he executed a will in which he divided his property amongst his widow, heirs, and next of kin. His widow, Mary B. Rhodes, was named as executrix, of the will. After making a number of bequests to several of his brothers, sisters, and nephews, he made the following bequest to his sister Ruby Rhodes Kebke, being Item 9' of the will, as follows:

“To my sister, Mrs. Ruby Rhodes…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of National Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Wiggins v. CheathamTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Connecticut Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. ChaseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
  4. American Trust & Banking Co. v. BalfourTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Ford v. CottrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. YIVO Institute for Jewish Research v. ZaleskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Pepka v. BranchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. In Re Estate of HumeTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Margaret Akins v. Pauline ClarkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  5. In Re The Estate of Clarice Lee MillerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API