Legal Opinion
Loy v. Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde
Grand Ronde Court of Appeals
Decided December 5, 2003No. A-01-08-024PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Chief Justice.
The Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon appeal the decision of the trial court remanding this case to the Enrollment Committee to apply the 1997 enrollment ordinance and the 1984 constitutional enrollment requirements to Mary Loy’s enrollment application. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to Tribal Code § 310(h)(2) and AFFIRM, although on different grounds than those relied upon by the trial court.
I.Facts
Ms. Loy submitted an application for tribal enrollment on December 1,1998. In accordance with the Grand Ronde constitutional enrollment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Ecker v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Lundgren v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Turtle Island Restoration Network Center for Biological Diversity v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Michael HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gleason v. Confederated Tribes of Grand RondeGrand Ronde Tribal Court · 2004
- Gomez v. Confederated Tribes of Grand RondeGrand Ronde Tribal Court · 2004
- Norwest v. Confederated Tribes of Grand RondeGrand Ronde Tribal Court · 2004