Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Carlton v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1983No. 82-1775PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to the Ohio Constitution, the commission has adopted specific rules for the purpose of affording employees reasonable protection in their places of employment. IC-5-08.03, Power Presses, states in Subsection (A)(1) that “[ejvery power press in use shall be constructed, or shall be guarded to prevent the hands or fingers of the operator from entering the danger zone during the operating cycle.” IC-5-08.03 (B)(1)(c) designates sweep guards as an approved method for complying with Subsection (A)(1). Appellant contends that her-employer violated IC-5-08.03, inasmuch as the sweep guards…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Humble v. Mark Concepts, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State ex rel. M. T. D. Products, Inc. v. StebbinsOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Aspinwall v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. White Motor Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API