Legal Opinion

Bates v. The People of the State of California

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 21, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01563Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GILBERT JOSEPH BATES, Case No.: 18cv1563 MMA (AHG) 12 Petitioner, ORDER: 13 v. (1) DENYING FIRST AMENDED 14 DANIEL A. PARAMO, PETITION FOR A WRIT OF 15 Respondent. HABEAS CORPUS [ECF No. 5] 16 (2) DENYING REQUEST FOR 17 EVIDENTIARY HEARING, AND 18 (3) DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF 19 APPEALABILITY 20 21 Gilbert Joseph Bates (“Petitioner”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 22 pauperis with a First Amended Petition (“FAP”) for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed under 23 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 5.)…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API