Legal Opinion
In re Jonathan M.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 2, 1997No. AC 14693PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The juvenile respondent appeals from the order of the Superior Court, Juvenile Matters, transferring his case to the regular criminal docket of the Superior Court in accordance with General Statutes (Rev. to 1993) § 46b-127.1 The trial court, after a hearing, *547found that the respondent was fifteen years of age at the time the murder was committed and that there was probable cause to believe that the respondent actually committed the acts with which he was charged. The respondent claims on appeal that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion to suppress evidence, (2)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. ClementeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Jonathan M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. BernierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998