Legal Opinion
Gabriel TORRE, Appellant, v. CASIO, INC., Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 21, 1994No. 94-5143PublishedCited by 202 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
LEWIS, Circuit Judge.
In this case, we address the standard that must be applied at summary judgment to a plaintiffs claims of discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (the “ADEA”). Because we find that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to the appellee, Casio, Inc. (“Casio”), we will reverse and remand for trial.
I
The dispute in this case involves Casio’s transfer and termination of Gabriel Torre during the period March through June, 1990. Because this case is before us upon grant of a summary judgment, we…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by202 opinions
- Charles S. JONES, Appellant, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Boyle v. County Of Allegheny PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Frederick F. KELLER, Appellant, v. ORIX CREDIT ALLIANCE, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Patricia M. Pivirotto v. Innovative Systems, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Abrams v. Lightolier Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
197 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.