Legal Opinion

RAYMOND v. TAYLOR

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 10, 2017No. 113,894PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATT, J.:

¶ 1 The question presented is whether the uninsured motorist insurance carrier is entitled to subrogation against the under-insured tort-feasor's assets, including excess insurance coverage, in the amount the uninsured motorist insurance carrier had previously paid to the injured party. We answer in the negative.

*1143 FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 This case originated with a motor vehicle accident on July 6, 2012. William Cole Taylor (Taylor) was driving a vehicle owned and insured by Guy's Seed Company (Guy's Seed); Appellant, Mark Raymond (Raymond), was a passenger in the vehicle…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Frey v. Independence Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Fulsom v. FulsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  5. Barnes v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. HAMILTON v. NORTHFIELD INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  2. THURSTON v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSUR. CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  3. Duke v. DukeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  4. HARRISON v. OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEMSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  5. SIMPSON v. STATE ex rel. v. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2020

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API