State v. Parker
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
COVINGTON, Judge.
In State v. Parker, 836 S.W.2d 930 (Mo. banc 1992), (Parker I) this Court remanded for a hearing to determine whether the prosecutor used the state’s peremptory strikes in a discriminatory manner, thus violating Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), and State v. Antwine, 743 S.W.2d 51 (Mo. banc 1987). The Court reserved review of appellant’s remaining points on appeal. On Feb ruary 5, 1993, the trial court held an evi-dentiary hearing pursuant to the instructions delineated in Parker I. The trial court found that the prosecutor’s peremptory…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. AntwineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Danial Siebert v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- State v. TokarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- State v. SilveySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- State v. RobertsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- State v. ClemonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.