Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 19, 1978PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant was indicted and convicted for rape. Since the offense was committed before the effective date of Section 13-1-130, Code of Alabama 1975, the jury fixed punishment at ten years' imprisonment.

The only allegation of error concerns the State's use of a 1961 conviction for grand larceny to impeach the appellant. The appellant contends that the seventeen year old conviction for a crime committed when he was seventeen years old is too remote in time to have any value in determining the credibility of a witness.

The rule in Alabama is settled and clear.

"It is within the sound discretion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rush v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Flournoy v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Lanier v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Davenport v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  5. Hale v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilsher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  2. Snyder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  3. Raines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Harbin v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API