Legal Opinion

Flournoy v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1948No. 8 Div. 606PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARWOOD, Judge.

The indictment against this appellant was in two counts, the first charging incest, and the second rape. His jury trial resulted in a verdict of guilty under the first count, that is, guilty of the offense of incest.

Appellant filed a demurrer to the indictment on the grounds that; there was a misjoinder of two offenses in the same indictment. The demurrer was overruled.

The appellant argues that a misjoinder results from the facts that the penalties provided respectively for rape and incest are not the same; that the rules for the admission of evidence are not the same, in that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Moulton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  3. Gibson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Mullins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Logan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Stockard v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Lanier v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  5. Aiola v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API