Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Neiswinger

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 15, 1984No. 1-883A248PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEAL, Presiding Judge. |

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Robert Meyer (Meyer) appeals from his conviction for direct criminal contempt for false testimony in the marriage dissolution hearing of Charlotte and Carl Neiswinger in the Putnam Circuit Court.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

Meyer testified as a witness for Carl Neiswinger on June 17, 1988 regarding surveillance activities directed toward Charlotte. Meyer stated he took several photographs of Charlotte following the couple's separation, and testified as to the events observed at the time each photo was taken. Charlotte called Maureen McCarty as a witness.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of NeiswingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Fields v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API