Legal Opinion

White v. Evans

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1984No. 16456-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARVIN, Judge.

Plaintiff-landowners appeal a judgment declaring, contrary to their demands, that production from an oil and gas unit that contained 40 acres of a 120-acre mineral servitude interrupted the 10 year non-use prescription accruing against the 80 acres of the servitude that was not in the unit. The unit well is not on the servitude tract. We affirm. La.Mineral Code Art. 75. See and compare Elson v. Mathewes, 224 La. 417, 69 So.2d 734 (1953); Crown Central Petroleum Corporation v. Barousse, 238 La. 1013, 117 So.2d 575 (1960); and Allied Chemical Corporation v. Despot, 414 So.2d 1346…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Elson v. MathewesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  2. Crown Central Petroleum Corporation v. BarousseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  3. Allied Chemical Corp. v. DespotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sandefer & Andress, Inc. v. PruittLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Martin Petitjean II v. Samson Contour Energy E & P, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Petitjean v. SAMSON CONTOUR ENERGY E & P, LLC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. White v. EvansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API