Legal Opinion
Groseth International, Inc. v. Tenneco Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 19, 1989No. 16206, 16207PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEEGE, Circuit Judge.
Previously, plaintiffs Groseth International, Inc. and Clifford Groseth appealed the entry of summary judgments against them. We determined that genuine issues of material fact existed and remanded the case for trial. Groseth International, Inc. v. Tenneco, Inc., 410 N.W.2d 159 (S.D. 1987).
Following remand, defendants Tenneco Inc., J.I. Case Company, and International Harvester Company admitted liability at trial for violations of SDCL 37-5-3. A jury returned substantial compensatory and punitive damage verdicts for the violation of SDCL 37-5-3 and for defamation.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Groseth International, Inc. v. Tenneco, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Alsteen v. GehlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Kunkel v. United Security Ins. Co. of New JerseySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Aschoff v. Mobil Oil Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Buono Sales, Inc., in 18,911 v. Chrysler Motors Corporation, in 18,912. Appeal of Chrysler Corporation, in 18,913Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Tibke v. McDougallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Dahl v. SittnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Kjerstad v. Ravellette Publications, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Flockhart v. WyantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.