McCloud v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge.
In this interlocutory appeal, Lance McCloud appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the charges pending against him because he was not brought to trial within one year of the date he was charged with the offenses. McCloud raises two issues that we consolidate and restate as: whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss because his right to a speedy trial, provided by Rule 4(C) of the Indiana Rules of Criminal Procedure and the federal and state constitutions, was violated.
We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On October 15, 2009, law…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Alabama v. BozemanSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Sweeney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sterlen Shane Keller v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Eddie Spalding v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Scott Afanador v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Stephen R. Hollingsworth v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013