Kirk Johnson Co., Inc. v. Light
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
Plaintiff’s argument in support of its appeal is based largely on the testimony of its own witnesses. But as the verdict of the jury was in favor of the defendant we are obliged to consider all disputed questions of fact to have been settled in his favor, and to give him the benefit of all the evidence favorable to him and all inferences reasonably to be drawn from it.
Regarded from this standpoint, the following facts must be taken as established: On December 14, 1928 the' defendant ordered- from the plaintiff an auto-electric Victrola, Model 9-54, a combination of radio…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wright v. General Carbonic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Tinius Olsen Testing MacHine Co. v. Wolf Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Spiegelberg v. KarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Tete Bros. v. EshlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Bodek Son v. AvrachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carl Beasley Ford, Inc. v. Burroughs CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Comfort Springs Corp. v. Allancraft Furniture Shop, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Industrial Rayon Corp. v. CaplanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Kaminsky v. LevineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Farrell v. Kluge, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.