Guss v. Ford Motor Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.
March 20, 1934, plaintiff made application for compensation under the workmen’s compensation act (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 8407 et seq.) stating — “that the accident upon which claim for compensation is based in this matter occurred .on the -day of June, 1925, * * # and was caused by - resulting in temporary inability to use right foot developing into amputation of right leg above knee,” and asked for — “temporary total disability for about 75 weeks and specific disability for 175 weeks under 2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 8426, at $14 per week.”
Defendant denied any accidental injury or disability arising…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Panozzo v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Martilla v. Quincy Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Jaquith v. W. M. Ackerman Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by20 opinions
- McLean v. Eaton Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Hartsell v. Richmond Lumber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Thomas v. Griffin Wheel Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- Fitzpatrick v. Olds Division of General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- East Jordan Iron Works v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.