League Cycle Co. v. Abrahams
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from a judgment in. favor of the plaintiff, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, borough of Manhattan, first district. ‘
1Opinion of the CourtLeventritt, J.
In the spring of 1896, the plaintiff, then known as the Bolte Cycle Manufacturing Company, was engaged in the city of Milwaukee, in the manufacture of bicycles and bicycle parts. The defendant, at that time a manufacturer of folding beds and furniture in the city of Hew York, added a bicycle department to his business. It appears that he obtained possession of a circular issued and distributed by the plaintiff advertising as specialties certain improved forms of the ’96 hub, pedal and vise. The description of these specialties is prefaced by the following language: “ These articles' having…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Reed v. . RandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Hoe v. . SanbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Carleton v. . Lombard, Ayres Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Fairbank Canning Co. v. . MetzgerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Simon v. Cunard Line Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Steen v. Southern California Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
- Osborn v. American Ink Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
- Baylis v. WeibezahlNew York Supreme Court · 1903