Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Barlow v. Zeller

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided January 18, 1949No. File 81787PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

On May 21, 1947, the plaintiff was an employee of the state of Connecticut in the classified service and as such was entitled to the benefits of the Merit System Act. On that day he resigned his position under what he claims was “coercion and duress.” He seeks reinstatement to his employment and an order for compensation.

The defendant in his motion to quash holds that the plaintiff is not entitled to mandamus as he resigned his position and, further, that as an employee in the classified service he is restricted in his quest for relief to an appeal to the personnel appeal board. The second…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. State Ex Rel. GribbenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State ex rel. Young v. LadeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. City of Toledo v. OsbornOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. People ex rel. O'Connor v. HardingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922
  5. Kidd v. State Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Galotti v. City of Stamford, No. Cv 950145273 (Jul. 31, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API