George C. Riley v. New Jersey State Parole Board (069327)
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin
A well-established principle of ancient origin is that the legislature cannot increase the punishment for a crime after it has been committed. This simple principle — that after-the-fact laws cannot raise the punishment for earlier committed conduct — is embodied in the Ex Post Facto Clauses of both the Federal and New Jersey Constitutions, U.S. Const, art. I, § 10; N.J. Const, art. IV, § 7, 113.
In 2009, George C. Riley, then seventy-six years old, completed serving the entirety of his twenty-year sentence for aggravated sexual assault. On his release from prison, Riley was under no form of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Michael Belleau v. Edward WallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- State v. Richard Perez (072624)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
- State v. HesterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
- Does v. Lawrence WasdenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- In re G.H.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.