Legal Opinion
S. H. Kress & Co. v. Rust
Texas Supreme Court
Decided October 26, 1938No. 7196PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Judge Taylor
of the Commission of Appeals delivered the opinion for the Court.
In this case plaintiff in error, S. H. Kress & Company, complains that a release in full by Mrs. Nuavitte Rust, defendant in error, for her cause of action for damages against it was disregarded by the court and a recovery by her of $1,500.00 actual damages and $500.00 exemplary damages was allowed. The case was tried by the court without the aid of a jury. The essential facts are stated in the judgment of the trial court, which is set out in full in the opinion of'the Court of Civil Appeals. 97 S. W. (2d) 997.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Pfeuffer v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Sabinal State Bank v. EbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- S. H. Kress & Co. v. RustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jung Ja Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- JC Penney Company v. DuranCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Mitchell v. CC Sanitation CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Jung Ja Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Mitchell v. CC Sanitation CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968