Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Limerick, 1101201 (Ala. 12-9-2011)

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 9, 2011No. 1101201PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOODALL, Justice.

For the second time, we are called upon to address the validity of an order of the Etowah Circuit Court granting a new trial on the motion of Pamela Washington and her husband, Robert Washington, Jr. (“the Washingtons”). See Ex parte Limerick, 66 So.3d 755 (Ala.2011), which sets out the factual and procedural history of this action. In Limerick, we issued, on the petition of John Aldridge Limerick, a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to vacate its order granting the Washingtons’ motion for a new trial, which they filed pursuant to Rule 59, Ala. R. Civ. P. We issued…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DowlingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Ex Parte JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. PittsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  4. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Washington v. LimerickSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Progressive Insurance Co. v. BrownCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API