Legal Opinion

McAlpine v. Kratka

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 24, 1904No. Nos. 13,809—(74)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendant, as administrator of the estate of James H. Caldwell, deceased, from an order of the district court of Itasca county, McClenahan, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

This appeal is to review the action of the district court in reversing in part the order of the probate court of Itasca county allowing the account of the administrator of James H. Caldwell, deceased. Findings of fact were made by the trial judge. Motions were thereafter entered for amended findings and for a new trial, which were denied.

There were no pleadings filed in the district court, but an extended examination of the many items contained in the administrator’s account. The findings of the trial court sustained all but two, which *412were disallowed, whereby under the assignments it becomes…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Larson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rauen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. State & Railroad & Warehouse Commission v. Rock Island Motor Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  3. State and R. R. W. H. Comm. v. R.I. M. T. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. J. L. Shiely Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. J. L. Shiely Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API