Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Houk

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 20, 2022No. 2:21-cv-00488Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL K. BAILEY, Case No. 2:21-cv-488 Plaintiff, v. Judge James L. Graham MARC HOUK, et al., Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Michael K. Bailey is a state inmate proceeding without the assistance of counsel. He brings this action under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

against Defendants Marc Houk and Kathleen Kovach (collectively “Defendants”), members of the Ohio Adult Parole Authority (the “OAPA”), in their individual and official capacities. (Doc. 3.) Defendants moved to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.