Huff Energy Fund, L.P. v. Longview Energy Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentRebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Because I believe the $25 million cap on a supersedeas bond contained in Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 52.006(b)(2) applies per judgment debtor, I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority’s opinion. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 52.006(b)(2) (West 2008).
Here, the final judgment awarded to Longview Energy Company both money (certain production revenues plus $95.5 million) and property in the form of a constructive trust over leases and mineral interests covering a large number of acres in the Eagle Ford shale. Chapter-52 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Acker v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Texaco Inc. v. Pennzoil Company, State of Texas, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Fortune v. McElhenneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983