State v. Gunnell
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, C.J.
{¶ 1} This case has been litigated on three separate occasions and, after each conviction, the Second District Court of Appeals has found reversible error. Most recently, the appellate court concluded that jeopardy had attached and that the guilty verdicts must be reversed. We are compelled to agree.
{¶ 2} For the reasons that follow, we hold that the trial judge erred during the second trial by improperly declaring a mistrial and that the Double Jeopardy Clause bars the retrial of the appellee, Toneisha Gunnell. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed to the extent it…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. RoseOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Cleveland v. Schornstein Holdings, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. RoperOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.