In re the Narcotic Addiction Control Commission
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKeating, J.
This case presents for our consideration an attack upon the constitutionality of the procedural and substantive provisions of the Narcotic Control Act of 1966 as they relate to the compulsory treatment of addicts who have neither been charged nor convicted of criminal activity.
Pursuant to section 206 (subd. 2, par. a) of the Mental Hygiene Law “ [a]ny person with whom an alleged addict may reside or at whose house he may be, or the husband or wife, father or mother, brother or sister, or the child or the nearest relative available, or anyone who believes that a person is a narcotic addict, or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. VictorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re De La OCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. SuccopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pannell v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Fhagen v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- People ex rel. Wayburn v. SchupfNew York Court of Appeals · 1976