Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 2001PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 In this appeal, we re-examine when a trial court has the authority to sanction counsel based on the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct. We conclude that a trial court can sanction counsel by disqualification based on a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct only when the trial court has determined that disqualification is needed to ensure that the parties receive the fair trial that due process requires. We also conclude that even where circumstances are such as to allow a sanction for a violation of a Rule of Professional Conduct, the court must have evidence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. In Re Estate of PedrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Slater v. Rimar, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. LambertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Wilkerson v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ostroff v. Alterra Healthcare Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Sutch, R. v. Roxborough Memorial HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. In Re ByrnesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Lamb v. Pralex Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2004
  5. Misquez v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API