Legal Opinion

State v. Heckel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2001No. 69416-8PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

24 P.3d 404 (2001)

143 Wash.2d 824

STATE of Washington, Appellant,

v.

Jason HECKEL, doing business as Natural Instincts, Respondent.

No. 69416-8.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued March 20, 2001.

Decided June 7, 2001.

Honorable Christine Gregoire, Attorney General, Paula Lillian Selis, Helen Regina Cullen, W. Stuart Hirshfeld, Assts., Seattle, Jay Douglas Geck, Asst., Olympia, for Appellant.

Van Siclen & Stocks, Robert Craig Van Siclen, Auburn, Dale L. Crandall, Charese Rhony, Salem, for Respondent.

Miller, Nash, Brian William Esler, Richard J. Busch, Seattle, Amicus Curiae on Behalf of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Lybbert v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. BraymanWashington Supreme Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bostain v. Food Express, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Beyond Systems, Inc. v. Realtime Gaming Holding Co., LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Pierce County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2006

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API