Legal Opinion

In re McFarland

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided December 6, 1930No. 30598PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

Under a fair consideration of the testimony and the record, I think it is made to appear that the bankrupt mill hand acted fairly, in so far as his intelligence and knowledge directed him, and there was no intent or purpose at any time to mislead or defraud the creditors or to withhold any of his assets with fraudulent intent. Fraud is never presumed. The bankrupt states that the entire matter arose from a misunderstanding between him and his lawyer and from the information received from the employer as to the amount of wages due. The omission could more reasonably be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hall v. StephensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  2. Hills v. JosephCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  3. Lemagie v. Acme Stamp WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Taylor v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  5. In re CrookDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re DenissonWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. In Re WinelandDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1933
  3. In Re Michigan Sanitarium & Benevolent Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API