Legal Opinion
Caminero v. Rand
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 25, 1995No. 89 Civ. 3841 (MJL)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LOWE, District Judge.
In this action, Plaintiff Rudecindo Camine-ro, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, challenges the constitutionality of Section 251 of the New York Family Court Act (“Section 251”), both on its face and as applied.1
Currently before the Court are: (1) Plaintiffs objections to the June 30, 1994, Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Buchwald (“Report”), recommending that this Court grant the motion of Defendants Boufford and Channing to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brotherton v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Bethesda Lutheran Homes and Services, Inc. v. Joseph LeeanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Brotherton v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Gulino v. Board of Education of the City School District of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- N.N. v. Madison Metropolitan School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.