Legal Opinion

Dynes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 9, 1972No. 44976PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is aggravated assault of a police officer; the punishment, ninety (90) days.

The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.

Appellant’s sole ground of error is that the court erred in denying his motion “to have the [jury] panel reshaken in accord with Art. 35.11 1 of the [Vernon’s Ann.] Code of Criminal Procedure.”

The record reflects that on the day of the trial appellant filed a motion requesting the “Jury Shephard in the central jury room for criminal cases in Harris County, Texas, [to] cause the names of all the members of the general panel qualified…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Yanez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Latham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Woerner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Como v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API