Dynes v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MORRISON, Judge.
The offense is aggravated assault of a police officer; the punishment, ninety (90) days.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.
Appellant’s sole ground of error is that the court erred in denying his motion “to have the [jury] panel reshaken in accord with Art. 35.11 1 of the [Vernon’s Ann.] Code of Criminal Procedure.”
The record reflects that on the day of the trial appellant filed a motion requesting the “Jury Shephard in the central jury room for criminal cases in Harris County, Texas, [to] cause the names of all the members of the general panel qualified…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
3Cited by11 opinions
- Yanez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Latham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Woerner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Como v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.