Legal Opinion

Freiburger v. Texas Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1934PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

The facts material to a determination of this controversy are not in dispute. On or about August 7, 1931, the plaintiff entered into a so-called “service station agency contract” with the defendant, The Texas Company, a foreign corporation authorized to do business in this state, wherein- and whereby The Texas Company apppinted the plaintiff as its agent at a certain service station belonging to it. That contract provided:

“V. This contract shall remain in force until terminated by either party upon five days’ prior written notice; but the *548company reserves the right at any time to cancel the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Watson v. . RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Derry v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Stolz v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Louisiana Oil Corp. v. BryanMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Ludwigsen v. LarsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Buggs v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  2. Pecarovich v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. In Re Petroleum Carriers Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1954
  4. All States Service Station, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co. of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  5. National Overall Dry Cleaning Co. v. YavnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API