Hunnicutt v. Archer
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
1. The court erred in dismissing the petition upon the ground that the petition was brought more than twelve years after the execution of the deed sought to be reformed, and that for this reason the plaintiff’s cause of action-was barred by laches or the statute of limitations.
(а) To avail himself of such defense, a party must plead it. Parker v. Irvin, 47 Ga. 405; So. Ry. Co. v. Wells, 103 Ga. 209 (29 S. E. 714).
(б) A party in possession is not too late to move for reformation of a deed under which she claims title and right to possession until her possession is sought to be disturbed. Wall…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gibson v. AlfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Reese v. WymanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Smith v. BurrusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Wall v. ArringtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
- Adair v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Prince v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Jackson v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Steadham v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Minor v. FincherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Lynch Enterprise Finance Corp. v. Realty Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.