Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wilson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 12, 1933No. 14755Published

1DissentLattimore, Judge

(dissenting). — I regret the necessity for this dissent. The indictment herein charged appellant with driving a motor vehicle on North Fannin street of the city of Tyler while he was “to some extent” under the influence of intoxicating liquor. In fact, he was admittedly drunk, and the *419only defense interposed on the trial was that there was no such street in Tyler as North Fannin street. No issue was made as to the extent or degree of appellant’s drunkenness. No motion was made to quash the indictment. On appeal appellant raises in his brief the question that the indictment herein charges no…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. RodgersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
  2. State v. DudleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  3. People v. WeaverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  4. State ex rel. Sellers v. ParkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  5. Commonwealth v. LysethMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API