Legal Opinion
Flaxman v. Cheek
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 31, 1966No. Nos. 19863-19865PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JERTBERG, Circuit Judge:
Before us is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division, affirming the orders of the referee in bankruptcy allowing compensation for legal services rendered by appellants as attorneys for appellee, as receiver, in three related and consolidated bankruptcy cases in the amount of $250.-00, and ordering the appellants to pay to the appellee as trustee the sum of $1,-750.00.
The District Court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1334, and this court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
It appears…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Herbert Tepper v. Frank H. Chichester, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Bennett-Manning Co., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Fazakerly v. E. Kahn's Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
3Cited by1 opinion
- Flaxman, Coleman, Gorman & Rosoff v. Crules R. Cheek, Trustee of the Estate of Ward Brothers Furniture, Inc., Bankrupt, Flaxman, Coleman, Gorman & Rosoff v. Crules R. Cheek, Trustee of the Estate of Ward Brothers Furniture, Apartnership, Bankrupt, Flaxman, Coleman, Gorman & Rosoff v. Crules R. Cheek, Trustee of the Estate of Inland Furniture, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966