Bartlesville Zinc Co. v. James
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Rogers County; T. L. Brown, Judge. Action by R. T. James against the Bar-tlesville Zink Company. There wás a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
COLLIER, O.
This is an action brought by the defendant in error, hereinafter designated plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, to recover for personal injuries alleged to be due to failure of the defendant to properly guard an emery wheel operated in a smelter at Collinsville, in which the plaintiff was an employe.
The uncontradicted evidence is that the plaintiff was fifty-four years of age, and a blacksmith of much experience; that there were two emery wheels being operated in the plant of the defendant, said wheels being located about IS inches…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Tuohy v. Columbia Steel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Lee v. S. Pac. R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Ribich v. Lake Superior Smelting Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Jones v. Oklahoma Planing Mill & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Dickinson v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Barrows v. AlfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Fixico v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Likowski v. CatlettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.