State v. . Manuel
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
There is thus directly presented for our decision the question which was heretofore raised and argued in the case of Oxendine (ante, 2 vol., 435), but which it was then deemed neither necessary nor proper to determine, that is to say, whether the act of 1831, ch. 13 (See 1 Rev. Stat., ch. 3, secs. 86, 87, 88, 89), "to provide for the collection of fines imposed upon free negroes and free persons of color," be unconstitutional and void. Every case seriously questioning the constitutionality of a statute is entitled to the most deliberate consideration, because it invokes the exercise of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. . GlenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1859
- State v. . NewsomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1844
- State v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- State v. . James and David McIntireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
- State v. . RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Corum v. University of North CarolinaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Van Der Schelling v. U. S. News & World Report, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- State v. NealCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Harper v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
- Harper v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.