Legal Opinion

In Re Stavriotis

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 24, 1990No. 89 C 5838PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRIAN BARNETT DUFF, District Judge.

Wilkes Barre Associates has petitioned this court to remove a portion of the captioned proceedings from the Bankruptcy Court. This “motion to withdraw reference” is made pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(d). Because § 157(d) requires that the motion be timely, and this motion is not, it is denied.

FACTS 1

Emil Stavriotis was a general partner in Wilkes Barre Associates, a limited partnership (“Wilkes Barre”). Wilkes Barre’s sole purpose was to own a 98% limited partnership interest in another partnership, Wilkeswood Associates (“Wilkeswood”).…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In Re White Motor Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
  3. In Re Baldwin-United Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
  4. Burger King Corp. v. B-K of Kansas, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1986
  5. Carter Day Industries, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (In Re Combustion Equipment Associates, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Sevko, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  2. United States v. KaplanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
  3. Novak v. Lorenz (In Re Novak)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  4. Matter of Lissner Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  5. Davis v. Mahlmann (In Re Mahlmann)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API