Legal Opinion
Union B. L. Asso. Camden v. Childrey
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided June 10, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
No facts are in dispute herein. The single question for determination is whether a mortgagor is entitled to redeem the mortgaged premises, by payment of the amount of the decree and costs, after a sale has been made under a foreclosure decree and the sale has been confirmed, but before a deed has been executed by the officer who made the sale.
No claim is made that the sale was not regular in all respects or that the amount bid was not adequate. The claim is that the right of a mortgagor to redeem obtains until the delivery of a deed by the judicial officer.
The mortgaged premises were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morse v. Hackensack Savings BankNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1890
- Atwood v. CarmerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
- Wimpfheimer v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1898
- Silver v. CampbellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1875
- Carpenter v. ShanleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re SimmonsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- ALCO LAND AND TIMBER COMPANY, INC. v. BaerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Ghee v. DavenportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Penn Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n v. JoyceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Crane v. BielskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.