Legal Opinion
Crane v. Bielski
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 28, 1953PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
27 N.J. Super. 448 (1953)
99 A.2d 526
HENRY W. CRANE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MARY BIELSKI, WIDOW, AND GENEVIEVE BUSH, UNMARRIED, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS; WILLIAM ROSOFF AND NETTIE ROSOFF, HIS WIFE, PURCHASERS AT FORECLOSURE SALE, RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued August 31, 1953.
Decided September 28, 1953.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, W.A. SMITH and EWART.
Mr. A. Donald McKenzie argued the cause for the purchasers at foreclosure sale, respondents and cross-appellants (Messrs. Kein and Scotch, attorneys; Mr. Maurice A. Scotch,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Federal Title, C., Guaranty Co. v. LowensteinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Karel v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- Vanderbilt v. Brunton Piano Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Schwartz v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
- Ghee v. DavenportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crane v. BielskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Brookshire Equities, LLC v. MontaquizaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Matter of RossUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- In Re DowningUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- 79-83 Thirteenth Ave., Ltd. v. DeMarcoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.