Legal Opinion

United States v. Riley

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided October 18, 1971No. 7718PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PETTINE, Chief Judge.

The defendants’ motions for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule Crim.P. 33 are premised on the contention that they were denied such effective representation by counsel as to amount to a deprivation of Sixth Amendment Constitutional rights.

These defendants together with four others, namely Dennis Raimondi, Thaddeus Bigos, Nicholas Pari and Joseph DiCarlo, were tried jointly and convicted for theft and/or conspiracy to steal from an interstate shipment 18 U.S.C. §§ 659, 371. During the trial all were represented by private counsel — Raimondi by Alfred…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Ex Rel. Means v. SolemDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API