United States v. Riley
District Court, D. Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PETTINE, Chief Judge.
The defendants’ motions for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule Crim.P. 33 are premised on the contention that they were denied such effective representation by counsel as to amount to a deprivation of Sixth Amendment Constitutional rights.
These defendants together with four others, namely Dennis Raimondi, Thaddeus Bigos, Nicholas Pari and Joseph DiCarlo, were tried jointly and convicted for theft and/or conspiracy to steal from an interstate shipment 18 U.S.C. §§ 659, 371. During the trial all were represented by private counsel — Raimondi by Alfred…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States Ex Rel. Means v. SolemDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1978