Legal Opinion

Mignon v. Tuller Fabrics Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 14, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.

Plaintiffs are dress manufacturers; defendant is a designer and jobber of dress fabrics. In January, 1953, the parties entered into two written contracts for the purchase and sale of fabrics. Plaintiffs sue for defendant’s failure to deliver a very substantial part of the goods; and defendant relies upon an indication by plaintiffs they would not take the goods as excusing further performance both as a defense and to support a counterclaim in the action. The court dismissed defendant’s counterclaim at the end of the proof as a matter of law, and submitted plaintiff’s cause to the jury. A…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. P. K. Wilson & Son, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Estes v. Curtiss Aeroplane & Motor Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  3. Estes v. . Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Perlman v. M. Israel & Sons Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Plunkett v. Comstock, Cheney Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Joneil Fifth Avenue Ltd. v. Ebeling & Reuss Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  2. Food Management Group, LLC v. Matrix Realty Group, Inc. (In Re Food Management Group, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  3. Hartzell v. BurdickAlbany City Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API