Legal Opinion

Eisenkraft v. Armstrong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 1, 1991PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter *485alia, to recover damages for malicious prosecution and false arrest, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), entered September 7, 1989, as granted those branches of the motion of the defendant Town of Greenburgh which were for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s second and fourth causes of action insofar as asserted against it, and the defendant Catherine J. Armstrong cross-appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of the same order as denied her cross motion for summary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Colon v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Lee v. City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Carthens v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Collins v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Du Chateau v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. DeFilippo v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Mesiti v. WegmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Soto v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  5. Carrington v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API